Opinion About Sony Alpha DSLR-A390

High ISO still 3200 with aforementioned botheration of dejected and red dots in atramentous areas, still with CCD sensor that alone Nikon D3000 keeps as the cheapest aperture alternative. Last year all the key players chose CMOS chips with aerial ISO giving accessible results. Once there was 18-70 lens accessible to angle out from the crowd. There is no video, no HDR, no time lapse(interval shooting), no aerial ISO, maybe alone lower assembly amount with no account for a user, but manufacturer. It seems that business wants to baker a soup of leftovers, but it doesn't aroma any good
Opinion About Sony Alpha DSLR-A390.
What's the point? Sony, amuse acquaint me!
You appear the Sony Alpha A350 in January 2008. One ÿear after came the A380. Identical camera, but with a new, abhorrent grip.
Now, you accept appear the aforementioned camera yet addition time. But with the old A350-grip again.
NOTHING is new!!! Aforementioned hopelessy apathetic anatomy amount (2~2,5 fps)You haven't alike included video!
Don't you know, Sony? Every added DSLR architect accept video in some models.
I accept a Konica Minolta 7D and accept been cat-and-mouse for an Alpha A750, hopefully with video, for a continued time now.
Sony! Are you authoritative fun of me??